What Cataloging Donated Photographs Taught Me About House Rules

a chunk of my actual job is figuring out where a donated object came from and whether the story attached to it is true, or partly true, or something a family has repeated so many times it’s calcified into fact without ever being checked. someone brings in a photograph, tells me with total confidence it’s from 1920, and half my job is politely, carefully establishing whether that’s actually correct or just something a grandparent said once that nobody’s questioned since. provenance, we call it. where did this claim actually come from, and does the evidence back it up.

I did not expect this exact instinct to show up at a Thursday game night, but it did, in the middle of an argument about a rule.

someone at the table was certain about how a specific interaction worked, completely certain, the kind of certainty that comes from having played a game a hundred times with the same group and never once had anyone question the ruling. and it turned out, once we actually pulled up the rulebook, that the group had been playing it wrong for years. not a huge wrong, a small one, but a real one, and the reaction to being corrected was almost identical to what I see from donors at work when a family story doesn’t survive a records check. a little defensive at first, then genuinely curious once the actual source was on the table.

I think what struck me is how much “the way we’ve always done it” gets treated as evidence, in both contexts, when it’s really just repetition. a house rule that’s been played the same way for years feels true the same way a family photo caption feels true, worn smooth by retelling until nobody remembers it was ever an assumption instead of a fact. neither one is actually provenance. provenance is going back to the actual document, the actual rulebook, and checking.

I didn’t win any points at the table for being the person who insisted on pulling up the PDF mid-game, and I probably should’ve let it go given how minor the rule actually was. but once you’ve spent your working life caring about where a claim comes from, it’s hard to switch that instinct off just because the stakes are a board game instead of a museum record.

we play it correctly now. the group mostly forgave me. and I’ve started, only half joking, calling myself the game night registrar, which nobody but me finds as funny as I do.

← back to the blog